منابع مشابه
Authors' response to letter to the editor.
We thank Drs. Mandal and Goel for their interest in our work, but we disagree with their interpretation of the literature compared with our findings. While Waldert and associates did indeed find a correlation between a longer delay to nephroureterectomy (NUx) and more advanced stage, they did not report metastasis-free survival. Moreover, they found no difference in cancer-specific survival. Th...
متن کاملLetter to the Editor: Authors' Response.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the concerns of Dr Reneman and colleagues about our paper, Kersnovske et al. [13]. Dr Reneman and colleagues have raised two issues that we address below. Their first concern relates to the use of experts for the purpose of validation. We assume the authors are not concerned with the use of experts as a method of content validation, per se, as this is...
متن کاملLetter to the editor: Authors' reply
To the Editor: We welcome the interest and enthusiasm of Halber et aL (1997) in the nonparametric randomization test that we described (Holmes et aL, 1996) not least because they called their program 'Sherlock', However, as the great detective would surely have pointed out, there are a num ber of flaws in the article that led the authors to an incorrect primary conclusion, that our test "is a ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
سال: 2008
ISSN: 1079-5006,1758-535X
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/63.1.107-a